Higgs Boson, "God Particle".
very cool stuff in the world of Physics and science in general. there are groups of scientists who believe otherwise and you can find their research online very easily if youre interested. Physics makes me smile.
Meet people who share your tastes. | Sign up It's free and takes 2 minutes | to see your matches |
Anything goes!
very cool stuff in the world of Physics and science in general. there are groups of scientists who believe otherwise and you can find their research online very easily if youre interested. Physics makes me smile.
no offense but......joking but seriously...
https://getpocket.com/explore/item/new-quantum-paradox-clarifies-where-our-views-of-reality-go-wrong
Don't you love that journalistic sensationalism...? God's Particle! Fucking awesome name for the quantum excitation of the Higgs field.
was just watching bbc, they were saying speed of light might not be constant and mentioned something about photon and illusionary.
Does that mean the speed of light is affected by the observer ?
It's a particle accelerator. It may have more uses in the future as most accelerators do. Second of all, scientific experiments are NEVER cheap and they never should be so I don't even know why you're complaining about the money they've spent because I have no idea what you're trying to get to.
In 1964 three teams proposed related but different approaches to explain how mass could arise in local gauge theories. These three, now famous, papers were written by Robert Brout and François Englert,[1][2] Peter Higgs,[3] and Gerald Guralnik, C. Richard Hagen, and Tom Kibble,[4][5] and are credited with the prediction of the Higgs boson and Higgs mechanism which provides the means by which gauge bosons can acquire non-zero masses in the process of spontaneous symmetry breaking.[6]
What i am saying is 8 billion really worth a confirmation that his theory was right. Update the thread when they find something new out resulting from this new discovery.
I assume they will continue to use cern to replicate their findings and further analyses.
If the confirmation of higgs leads to new way of seing things good but the theory was out there already.
Experiments were done mainly to have data on something and theories confirm it, what are you even talking about?
If someone finds out from their research where the material and particles came from at the start and what created a large enough force to create a universe then I will say great.
If the confirmation of higgs leads to new way of seing things good but the theory was out there already.
ROFL good luck with that, the question would still remain where did these particles come from in the first place and why did they smash together, they need a massive collider to find the particle, so what sort of force would be needed to create a universe and where did that force come from, the questions would continue if they knew how, never ending.
Try having that debate with Lawrence Krauss and we'll see what you have to say afterwards.
much more interesting than higgs and im sure a fraction of the price
I'm not going to repeat my point again, if you honestly don't trust the rigour that led them there then by all means continue your own line of research and have it peer reviewed. Their theories and experiments have far more significance than your every day science sceptics who know more about interesting things and prices. Science provides a body of knowledge which can later be applied in engineering and that's not all, the experiments being done in this area are about unravelling whatever there is in nature.
Second of all, if the answer was that intuitive as: "the answer is never ending" then they wouldn't bother building a giant colliders and try to deal with the non-intuitive nature of the findings that have come forth not to mention the complex mathematics that there is.
much more interesting than higgs and im sure a fraction of the price
See More
2010-2024 Tastebuds Media Ltd, All rights reserved
Handcrafted with love by musicians in London, UK